eventually, the grain of pressure treated wood boards will become so open and porous that they will need to be replaced. the general lifespan of a pressure treated wood deck is between ten to fifteen years. composite. composite boards consist of sawdust, or wood flour, and plastic along with a binding agent and pigments.
pressure treated wood: pressure treated wood, on the other hand, only lasts about 10-15 years with no warranty. 3. aesthetics. composite: from afar composite decking material resembles real wood and depending on the color, painted wood.
composite decking requires much less maintenance than pressure treated decking. composite decks don’t require staining at all. some composite decks, such as correct deck, also offer a hidden fastener system that is much more cosmetically appealing than the traditional face nailing methods.
choosing a deck: plastic or wood? - houzz. 18 jul 2013 get the pros and cons of wood, plastic, composite and more decking wood decks are made of cedar, redwood (pictured), pressure-treated pine or ipe, "manufacturing costs are very low, versus a composite decking board.
take a closer look at the total cost of building a deck with composite decking vs pressure treated wood. if the material cost to build a deck entirely with pressure treated wood is $5,000, a homeowner can expect a composite deck of the same size to cost $9,000 or more.
finally, the cost of the cedar is moderate, more than pressure-treated but somewhat less than composite. the pros and cons of pressure-treated decking if economy and longevity are your bag, go with pressure-treated wood.
composite boards typically cost more because the manufacturing process is far more intense. even so, you’ll almost certainly use at least some pressure-treated lumber for an outdoor project like a deck or gazebo: deck joists and structural beams are nearly always made with sturdy southern yellow pine.